The Ed Hochuli Bowl

As ESPN refuses to let anyone in earshot of a TV forget, its Capital One Bowl Week! 

And while nothing gets me more excited than the R+L Carriers New Orleans Bowl there are two dandies in San Di-ago this week.

First you have the San Diego County Credit Union Poinsettia Bowl featuring BCS snub and 9th-ranked Boise State against 11th-ranked TCU. Money talks and there is no disputing that but its a shame that the BCS darling Broncos and Ian Johnson who shocked the Sooners in 2006 are playing this early. 

Considering the fifth BCS game is Cincinnati (ranked 12th) and Virginia Tech (ranked 21st) based on giving berths to conferences that have no good teams this game is a de-facto fifth place game as long as I'm concerned.

Then comes Sunday. While the Broncos-Chargers tussle interests me very little, two side stories do. First you have the hangover from the Ed Hochuli call. The uber-referee who inexplicably blew a play dead while Jay Cutler fumbled making it un-reviewable and giving the Broncos a chance to win all the way back in week 2. 

But more on that in a second.

Chris Berman said on Sportscenter last night that the play was pretty much excused now because the Chargers (7-8) have a chance to win the division this week if they beat the Broncos (8-7) based on the tiebreaker. 

While I am a strong believer in things never unfolding the exact same way, uh, Boomer are you kidding me?

If that call goes the other way like it should have the Chargers would be 8-7 and the Broncos 7-8. In other words, the Chargers would have already clinched the division via the second tiebreaker.

After head-to-head which would be 1-1 - if the Chargers laid down this week and rested their players for the playoffs - the second divisional tiebreaker is winning percentage within the division. San Diego is 4-1 (would be 5-0) while Denver is 3-2 (would be 2-3).

So in no way is Hochuli vindicated yet. Does San Diego still have a chance to take care of business and win the division on Sunday? Sure, but they shouldn't have to.

So we are left with the Ed Hochuli Bowl. But here is where the sponsors need to step in. Every other bowl has some absurd 10-word corporate moniker preceding its title so why not this one?

GNC is the first logical choice in honor of Hochuli's governator-esque physique but it seems too succinct. So does HGH.

My front-runner to this point would be BALCO. Despite the San Francisco steroid studio's dubious past I think it would be very fitting. Something says Bud Selig might not agree.

Imagine Al Michaels saying, "Live from San Diego its the Chargers and the Broncos in the Bay Area Labratory Co-Operative Ed Hochuli Bowl! Will the Broncos get one call? Stay tuned to find out! Its Sunday Night Football on NBC!"

If they can bump Leno to 10 pm they can't be above this right?